Within the last couple years there has been a growing movement in the running community to go barefoot while running. Shoe companies such as Newton and Nike have developed shoes to allow for a more barefoot feel. Christopher McDougal in his brilliant book, "Born to Run" advocates the theories that shoes have done more to damage us than running barefoot as we did before the advent of the running shoe.
I have not spoken much on this much, but I want to spend some time to deal with it today. Here is my initial thoughts....I think barefoot running can work brilliantly for some people. I think it allows for greater flexibility in runing. It also makes for stronger leg muscles.
Where do I see the flaws? There are people out there who need shoes. I am one of them. My limited range of motion is not helped by going barefoot. If you were to watch me walk without shoes, you would wonder how I even get up in the morning. Shoes give me support and a platform to move.
The flaws I see in the arguments I have read is that the shoe companies are pushing too much cushioning and control. All shoe companies make shoes which span the spectrum from basic cushioning to motion control.
Cushioning has come under attack in these arguments. When I fit someone for shoes, I bring out varying levels of cushioning, because I have no idea what the customer likes. I divide people into two camps: those who want to run on pillows and those that want to feel the ground. I am a ground person. Too much cushion makes me feel unstable, and actually bothers my feet and ankles. For others though, they love it.
Stability is also under attack by these critics. There is a misconception out there about what stability does in a shoe. Stability is not meant to correct overpronation. It is meant to reduce it to make running a bit easier. Runners have it in their heads that overpronation is bad. It isn't. It is the natural movement of our feet. For some people extreme overpronation can bring about various issues. Only in those cases should a motion control shoe be considered. 75%-80% of us overpronate. When your gait is being analyzed the fitter should be looking for the range of overpronation, and suggesting appropriate levels of stability.
I also don't get into some of the conspiracy theories that shoe companies allegedly have. Sorry folks, these people can't even make a consistant shoe, let alnoe organize themselves to keep people from running barefoot. Don't mistake marketing for conspiracy.
My suggestion is if you want to try barefoot running - go for it. Don't throw the shoes away comepletely. McDougal in a recent Runners Round Table discussion talked about how once you learn how to run barefoot - as in the correct form, then add a shoe which will enhance it, but not change the form.
Now it is easy to say, "Charlie you work in the shoe business, you are just part of the problem." Yes, I work in a running store, but I make it clear to all my customers that in the end the shoe they go home with is the one which should feel like a natural extension of themselves. It should be work with them, and not against them. If that is a "Five Fingers" shoes, or a Brooks Beast, then so be it.
There need not be a war over this, as I have read in some forums. There is room at the table for all runners and running types.
Charlie