Lance Armstrong is an icon. He won 7 Tour de France races. Of course the cloud of drugs was always around him. Still he defiantly stated time and time again that he did not use drugs. For the record, I have always believed he used, as did most of the riders of his time(through today). We now know Armstrong has been banned from international competition.
Armstrong has won the non-biking world over with his battle against Cancer, and his Livestrong Foundation, which helps millions affected by the disease. Since his retirement, Armstrong has remained active in various races, from triathlons to marathons to bike rides. He uses these events to raise awareness and money for his foundation.
I get it though, he is banned by the USDA. Shouldn't that apply though to the sports he actually could win? Yes, ban him from cycling, but why not let him run a marathon? He isn't going to win. He just wants to do his best like so many other runners out there. He is not threat to the Kenyans.
The Chicago Marathon announced last week that Armstrong would not be allowed to run this year's race, due to the ban. I understand why. Chicago is part of the World Marathon Majors, and they don't want to piss off the USDA or USTAF. Cowards. His running the race is an attraction. The common runner guns for him. It's fun. I have met a lot of people who have been in the same race as Armstrong, and they have told be how they "beat"him. Who wouldn't want a chance to beat the great Lance Armstrong?
Chicago, you blew this one. You played politics, and you played it safe. Bad call. I say let Lance run.
Charlie
No comments:
Post a Comment